Saturday 20 September 2014

MEDICALLY ATTENDED DOG BITES ACTUAL FACTS







How often do dog bites require medical attention?  
(Sources for this graph)[1]

According to the most widely cited studies of dogs bites[2] at least 4 out of 5 (80%) of all dog bites cause no injury at all or injuries so minor that no medical treatment was sought, even though the threshold for medical treatment may well be lower for dog bite injuries than from those from other causes.

The rate of dog bites sustained by children has been steadily decreasing over the last decade:
 
                                                                                   (Sources for this graph)[3]

How severe are these injuries?
  
      • Among injuries presented for treatment at Emergency Departments, dog bite injuries are generally much less severe than the typical injury:

          • • 96% of dog bite injuries presenting at ER’s are minor[4]-- the person is treated and released, among the highest rate of treat and release for any injury tracked by the CDC.
          • • Less than 1.5% require hospitalization[5], unlike injuries in general, which result in hospitalization more than 4 times as often.

        • Severity comparisons with other common injury modalities may be helpful here:

        • • Kids 1-12 who go to the ER with an object stuck in an ear or eye or nose[6] are more than 3 times more likely to be injured seriously enough to be hospitalized than those who present with a dog bite. This does not include objects swallowed or stuck in a child’s throat or airway which are even more serious.
        • • Injuries caused by shoes and socks[7] (not counting sports shoes) are almost 4 times more likely to require hospitalization than dog bites

Our data

We use the Center for Disease Control’s Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS)[8] for dog bites and other injury modalities and the Consumer Product Safety Commission[9] for product related injuries, both of which use the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). This provides the most reliable data because NEISS:

• Collects large samples, gathering data from a nationally representative sample of 100 hospital emergency departments (EDs), ranging from large inner-city hospitals with trauma centers to suburban, rural, and children’s hospitals
• Is based on actual emergency room intake data
• Provides clear indicators of injury treatment severity
• Have been consistently replicated each year over a long period
• Allow for ready access to comparisons by year, age group, gender, and kind of injuries
• Limitation—NEISS captures injuries treated in hospital emergency departments, not private doctor’s offices or urgent care clinics

We do refer to the most frequently cited studies but only as a source of overall bite incidence, including those that cause no injury. We do not use them as our primary source of bite severity or injurious bite incidence because they:
         
          • • Are based on small sample telephone surveys asking people to remember events over a year’s time
          • • Had low respondent rates and wide margins of error
          • • Are one time surveys that quickly become dated and are seldom replicated exactly
          • • Provide only vague distinctions between injurious and non-injurious bites and vague definitions of injury
            •  


        Updated 26 November 2013


        SOURCES and NOTES:

        [1] Slight or No Injury & Minor Medical Treatment:
         Gilchrist et al., 2008 (see below) were used for the total number of bites, and for the percentage receiving medical treatment, as this (and the predecessor, Sacks et al., 1996) is the only study that has attempted to include non-injurious incidents in dog bite counts 
        Serious:
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), Non-fatal injury reports, 2001-2012. http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfirates2001.html
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: Transferred or Hospitalized; Years: 2001-2003 [Averaged]
        Fatalities:
        National Canine Research Council. (2012).

        [2] Sacks J.J., Kresnow,  M.J., & Houston, B. (1996).  Dog bites: How Big a Problem? Injury Prevention2, 52-54. Retrieved from: http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/2/1/52.full.pdf

        Gilchrist J., Sacks J.J., White, D., & Kresnow, M.J. (2008). Dog Bites: Still a Problem? Injury Prevention, 14(5), 296-301.

        These 2 studies are the source of the frequently cited 4.5 million annual dog bite rate in the United States, and are the result of a telephone survey of all types of injuries sustained by members of 5,238 households in the 1996 study and 9,684 in the study published in 2008. The results include all bites that the respondents could recall during the preceding year, including those that caused no injury. 

        [3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), Non-fatal injury reports, 2001-2012. http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfirates2001.html
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: All Cases; Years: 2001-2011 [Separate query each year]; Age Group: 0-4
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: All Cases; Years: 2001-2011 [Separate query each year]; Age Group: 5-9
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: All Cases; Years: 2001-2011 [Separate query each year]; Age Group: 10-14
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: All Cases; Years: 2001-2011 [Separate query each year]; Age Group: 1-12
        All rates converted from 100,000 to 10,000.

        [4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), Non-fatal injury reports, 2001-2012. http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfirates2001.html
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: Treated and Released; Years: 2001-2012

        [5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), Non-fatal injury reports, 2001-2012. http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/nfirates2001.html
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: All Cases; Years: 2001-2012.
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: Hospitalized; Years 2001-2012.

        [6] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS), Non-fatal injury reports,
        Query: Foreign Body; Disposition: Hospitalized; Years: 2001-2012
        Query: Bite: Dog; Disposition: Hospitalized; Years: 2001-2012 

        [7] US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) NEISS estimates query builder,  https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/NEISSQuery/home.aspx
        Query: Code 1645 (daywear socks); Year: 2012
        Query: Code 1615 (non-athletic shoes); Year: 2012

        [8] This system collects data from a large sample of emergency departments (ED’s), in a standardized methodology since 2000 ensuring valid comparisons from year to year. See http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/facts.html for an explanation of how this data is collected and compiled

        [9] This system collects data from a large sample of emergency departments (ED’s), in a standardized methodology since 2000 ensuring valid comparisons from year to year. See http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Research--Statistics/NEISS-Injury-Data/ for an explanation of how this data is collected and compiled
        - See more at: http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/dogbites/medically-attended-dog-bites/#sthash.0zz7wxdZ.dpuf

        Thursday 18 September 2014

        Canberra police officer who sprayed capsicum spray towards chained dog gets no charges or consequence

        Canberra police officer who sprayed capsicum spray towards chained dog breached standards

        Michael Inman September 17, 2014
        A screenshot from the security vision at the property.
        A screenshot from the security vision at the property.Photo: Supplied
        An ACT police officer who fired capsicum spray towards a tethered dog during a raid at a southside home will not face criminal charges, but has been ordered to undergo formal counselling and retraining.
        The owner of the dog only found out about the reprimand after ACT Policing issued a press release late on Wednesday afternoon, prompting allegations police were more interested in repairing their damaged image than safeguarding the dog's welfare.
        Police on Wednesday said an internal investigation into the May incident had found the officer had breached professional standards.
        The report would not be made public.
        Chief Police Officer for the ACT Rudi Lammers said the force would also seek RSPCA co-operation to provide extra training for police in dealing with animals in the course of their duty.


        CCTV footage revealed on The Canberra Times showed a plain-clothes Australian Federal Police officer spraying towards a chained dog during a search of an unoccupied Griffith house in May.

        Tuesday 16 September 2014

        17 Things Every Pit Bull Owner Is Sick Of Hearing









        17 Things Every Pit Bull Owner Is Sick Of Hearing

        Despite the stereotype, we know our dogs are the best.posted on Sept. 16, 2014, at 9:50 a.m.


        1. “Pit bulls eventually snap and turn on their owners.”

        "Pit bulls eventually snap and turn on their owners."
        Getty Images/iStockphoto sanjagrujic
        The American Pit Bull Terrier breed profile calls the dogs “outgoing and people loving. Properly socialized dogs are extremely friendly, even with strangers.”

        2. “They have locking jaws, which makes them even more dangerous.”

        "They have locking jaws, which makes them even more dangerous."
        Photo Credit: NiteLynx via Compfight cc
        The jaws of a pit bull function just the same as any other breed!

        3. “Pit bulls are inherently vicious.”

        "Pit bulls are inherently vicious."
        Photo Credit: russteaches via Compfight cc
        This stereotype unfairly generalizes and condemns the whole breed based on the actions of a few bad owners.

        4. “They’re aggressive toward humans, especially children.”


        In the aggression temperament test run by the ATTS, many of the breeds included under the “pit bull” name scored extremely high. The test measures aggression, reaction to stimuli, and human interaction. The higher the score, the less aggressive the dog.

        5. “Pit bulls are more dangerous than any other kind of dog.”

        According to the National Canine Research Council, “there is no evidence from the controlled study of dog bites that one kind of dog is more likely to bite a human being than another kind of dog… no group of dogs should be considered disproportionately dangerous.”

        6. “Pit bulls should be banned because they’re a danger to the public.”

        "Pit bulls should be banned because they're a danger to the public."
        Breed-specific legislation has been enacted in various regions around the world and it’s only shown that banning a specific breed does not succeed in reducing dog bites.

        7. “If pit bulls are so sweet, why do we always hear about attacks?”

        "If pit bulls are so sweet, why do we always hear about attacks?"
        Getty Images/iStockphoto Jprine
        The pit bull stereotype leads to bias reporting from the media. In addition, “pit bull” isn’t actually breed, but rather a blanket term for many breeds, which means that sometimes dogs are inaccurately identified as pit bulls.

        8. “The reason so many pit bulls end up in shelters is because they’re bad dogs.

        "The reason so many pit bulls end up in shelters is because they're bad dogs."
        There are an estimated 5,000,000 pit bulls and pit bull-type breeds in the United States. With the overflow of breeding combined with bad reputation, many pit bulls end up in shelters. Since pit bulls are used for fighting, shelters are wary of adopting out pit bulls should they end up in the wrong hands. In addition, due to breed bans in communities and apartment complexes, many families are often forced to give up their loving family pets.

        9. “It doesn’t matter if the owner is good or bad, pit bulls are unpredictable and dangerous.”


        The ASPCA released a position statement on pit bulls in which they say, “The reality is that dogs of many breeds can be selectively bred or trained to develop aggressive traits. Therefore the responsible ownership of any dog requires a commitment to proper socialization, humane training and conscientious supervision.”

        10. “They are malicious killing machines.”

        "They are malicious killing machines."
        Pit bulls are so affectionate toward humans, even strangers, that their breed profile specifically states that they don’t make good guard dogs.

        11. “Pit bulls are the most aggressive dog breed.”

        "Pit bulls are the most aggressive dog breed."
        According to the American Temperament Test Society, the American Pit Bull Terrier scored better in an aggression test than many dog breeds, including golden retrievers and beagles.

        12. “You’re an irresponsible dog owner for getting such a vicious, unpredictable breed.”


        A good dog owner understands that every dog needs proper care, exercise, training, and supervision. This stands true regardless of the breed.

        13. “Pit bulls will attack even if unprovoked.”


        There are reasons behind dog bites, regardless of breed, so it’s important to practice dog bite prevention. It’s also necessary to supervise and understand the behavior of each individual dog you interact with.

        14. “Every pit bull is a fighting dog.”

        "Every pit bull is a fighting dog."
        Photo Credit: Rob Swatski via Compfight cc
        Pit bulls are a descendent of the “original English bull-baiting dog.” Their role changed after bull-baiting was outlawed and they became “popular family pets, noted for their gentleness, affection, and loyalty.”

        15. “Their behavior is genetically determined.”

        "Their behavior is genetically determined."
        Genetics contribute to a dog’s behavior in certain ways, but behavior is largely connected to environment and socialization. It can even be linked to things such as “early nutrition, stress levels experienced by the mother during pregnancy, and even temperature in the womb.”

        16. “They’re man-eaters.”


        The ASPCA says that, “all dogs, including pit bulls, are individuals. Treating them as such, providing them with the care, training and supervision they require, and judging them by their actions and not by their DNA or their physical appearance is the best way to ensure that dogs and people can continue to share safe and happy lives together.”

        17. “Some of them may be good dogs for a while…but eventually they all turn into bloodthirsty killers.”

        "Some of them may be good dogs for a while...but eventually they all turn into bloodthirsty killers."
        Tons of pit bulls have lived lives as loyal, loving, and happy family pets without snapping on their owners.